secure-xml-rpc
Secure XML-RPC
More secure wrapper for the WordPress XML-RPC interface.
Proof Health
Open evidenceCommercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.
54.2% of this page's analysis has direct source links.
0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.
0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.
Related Opportunities
4 marketsSource Evidence
Open evidence explorerConfusion about calculating the Authorization header: users show security, bugs, compatibility pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsI cannot configure the plugin: users show security, missing feature, support pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsDonate link is broken: users show bugs, missing feature, support pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsSecure fail ?: users show security pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsAdding a app key: users show support, setup pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsError: users show bugs pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsMust have when using WordPress XMLRPC API: users show migration, setup pain that may indicate a product gap.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsVery useful plugin: praise conversation with limited structured signal.
Buyer: site owners, agencies, and maintenance teams · Wedge: test security lockouts, bot/spam defenses, risky access changes, and incident alertsCompetitor Context
16 shownRepeated Themes
0 shownNo repeated plugin-level themes have been generated yet.
Collected Signals
8 shown from 8 collectedSecure fail ?: users show security pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: This plugin has been hacked on a client website… This plugin has been hacked on a client website…Error: users show bugs pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Error I try to use the plugin with a remote Java library and get an error: Code: -32700 redstone.xmlrpc.XmlRpcFault: parse error.Adding a app key: users show support, setup pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Adding a app key Hi there , I want to add the blogpress app using your plugin , I have installed it and all is fine Except I can not see the page as per your screenshot or link which allows me to add the app ?I cannot configure the plugin: users show security, missing feature, support pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: I cannot configure the plugin Hi, Thanks for making this plugin available.Donate link is broken: users show bugs, missing feature, support pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Donate link is broken The donate link for this plugin is broken, most likely a minus sign is missing, as secure-xmlrpc should read secure-xml-rpc .Must have when using WordPress XMLRPC API: users show migration, setup pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Must have when using WordPress XMLRPC API In general, it’s good that the WordPress XMLRPC API is enabled per default in order to allow more integrated Web platforms and software, but the username/password authentication mechanism makes a WordPress installation very vulnerable to brute force and dictionary attacks, and even primitive network sniffing if HTTPSConfusion about calculating the Authorization header: users show security, bugs, compatibility pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: I think all I need to do is compute and encode the header and pass it along to the server, but when I do so, I get an error that says username and password are invalid.Very useful plugin: praise conversation with limited structured signal.
Evidence: Very useful plugin