footnotation
Footnotation
An easy way to add footnotes to your posts.
Proof Health
Open evidenceCommercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.
100.0% of this page's analysis has direct source links.
0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.
0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.
Related Opportunities
0 marketsNo opportunity report currently maps to this plugin's tags.
Source Evidence
Open evidence explorerPosition of the footnote-section: users show compatibility, support pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Only loaded when needed?: users show compatibility pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
[feature req] Multiple references to note: users show missing feature pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Check box for “Show footnotes only on single posts or pages” has no effect: users show missing feature pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
reference list not showing: question conversation with limited structured signal.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Changing Color: question conversation with limited structured signal.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Essential plugin – CSS suggestions: users show missing feature, support, migration pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Great, easy-to-use, reliable plugin!: users show support pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Very Easy and Nice: users show missing feature pain that may indicate a product gap.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
an elegant solution: users praise easy, which suggests what competitors already do well.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Competitor Context
8 shownThis row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Repeated Themes
0 shownNo repeated plugin-level themes have been generated yet.
Collected Signals
12 shown from 12 collectedChanging Color: question conversation with limited structured signal.
Evidence: Changing Color I use this on my (in-progress) blog. Unfortunately, the font is only slightly darker than the background. How do I change the font color or other characteristics? Thank You to anyone who can give me a touch of guidance on this. I use this on my (in-progress) blog. Unfortunately, the font is only slightly darker than the background. How do I chThis row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Excellent Plugin — but violates shortcodes syntax: users praise easy, quality, which suggests what competitors already do well.
Evidence: Excellent Plugin — but violates shortcodes syntax We’ve used this plugin since fd-footnotes was abandoned.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Very Easy and Nice: users show missing feature pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Very Easy and Nice The #1 choice for any one who wants to make footnotes.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
[feature req] Multiple references to note: users show missing feature pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: [feature req] Multiple references to note Hi there!This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Great, easy-to-use, reliable plugin!: users show support pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Great, easy-to-use, reliable plugin!This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Check box for “Show footnotes only on single posts or pages” has no effect: users show missing feature pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Check box for “Show footnotes only on single posts or pages” has no effect I do not have a caching plugin, but regardless of which setting chosen for “Show footnotes only on single posts or pages” the footnotes are still shown on the blog home page.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Only loaded when needed?: users show compatibility pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: (Especially not on the front page) I don’t know if there’s a functions.php snippet I could use…?This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Essential plugin – CSS suggestions: users show missing feature, support, migration pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Essential plugin – CSS suggestions Thank you for continuing the now unsupported fd-footnotes plugin.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
an elegant solution: users praise easy, which suggests what competitors already do well.
Evidence: an elegant solution This plugin manages footnotes in an easy, convenient, and robust way.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Position of the footnote-section: users show compatibility, support pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Only as a idea, maybe using a shortcode [footnotation-response], and hook here all footer notes list.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
Can’t activate 1.1: users show bugs, compatibility pain that may indicate a product gap.
Evidence: Apache 2.4/NGINX, PHP7, WordPress 4.7.2; Site language Latvian (lv) Cant activate footnotation 1.1.This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.
reference list not showing: question conversation with limited structured signal.
Evidence: reference list not showing does it show the reference list automatically at the end of post or do i still need to add something to show it? does it show the reference list automatically at the end of post or do i still need to add something to show it?This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.