WPIntell

Source evidence

Useless without support for custom posts

Simple Content Templates for Blog Posts & Pages · review · 2013-04-07T22:16:00+00:00

complaintsentiment
highseverity
1.0relevance
2replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

4 / 26 rows with source links

15.4% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

22 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

review · 1 stars
faktanett unresolved
Without support for custom posts, this plugin is near useless. According to plugin developer, it is “easy to add” (see FAQ) Still he demands to be paid in order to do so. Greedy. It takes a lot of time to maintain a free plugin, and releasing new features tends to fall to the bottom of the priority list. I have offered at various times to add this functionality in on a per request basis, for a small fee in lieu of a more permanent solution. This is simply my response to the reality of being a very busy freelancer. It is not fair to rate a plugin one star because it doesn’t do something it never advertised it would do and because the plugin author has the audacity to charge for his time. Greedy. It is certainly greedy behaviour to expect plugin devs who have contributed code – and by extension a whack of their time – to the community to bend to your will and churn out more features, especially when using the star rating system to apply pressure to that effect.

Comments

2 shown
Clifton Griffin 2013-07-20T15:05:00+00:00

It takes a lot of time to maintain a free plugin, and releasing new features tends to fall to the bottom of the priority list. I have offered at various times to add this functionality in on a per request basis, for a small fee in lieu of a more permanent solution. This is simply my response to the reality of being a very busy freelancer. It is not fair to rate a plugin one star because it doesn’t do something it never advertised it would do and because the plugin author has the audacity to charge for his time.

Barry Hughes 2013-07-24T17:18:00+00:00

Greedy. It is certainly greedy behaviour to expect plugin devs who have contributed code – and by extension a whack of their time – to the community to bend to your will and churn out more features, especially when using the star rating system to apply pressure to that effect.