WPIntell

Source evidence

Small new feature, share or new plugin?

WP Armour – Honeypot Anti Spam · support · 2026-05-04T11:12:00+00:00

complaintsentiment
highseverity
1.0relevance
2replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

4 / 28 rows with source links

14.3% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

24 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

support
Dade unresolved
Hi, I needed a more efficient way of banning bots and I ended up creating a small snippet/plugin to log the bots IPs straight in the error log. WP Armour usually just stops the submission and gives an error message. The spammer’s bot is still allowed to hit your server over and over again, consuming PHP resources and memory. By adding an error log with the offender IP, the server can process it directly with Fail2Ban (or similar) and block bots at network level. This is not intended as substitute for the Extended version, users still need it if they want to detect/block things like WooCommerce Checkout. So, the question here is, are you open to reviewing a PR for this, or would you prefer I maintain it as a standalone add-on? Long-term, I’m planning to maintain a community-shared, anonymized list of recurring bot patterns that could eventually complement WP Armour’s threat intelligence. This topic was modified 3 weeks, 3 days ago by Dade . Hi, This is a great idea. Moving the block to the network level is much more efficient for saving server resources, and I like the long-term vision for the shared bot list. I’d prefer a Pull Request to keep things integrated and seamless for users. However, if you think it’s better suited as a standalone add-on due to the technical requirements, I’m open to that as well. Let me know how you’d like to proceed! Best regards, Kindly share the repo, I couldn’t find it before and that’s why I was posting here. It hooks wpa_handle_spammers directly, so it’s pretty straight forward.

Comments

2 shown
Dinesh Karki 2026-05-05T09:20:00+00:00

Hi, This is a great idea. Moving the block to the network level is much more efficient for saving server resources, and I like the long-term vision for the shared bot list. I’d prefer a Pull Request to keep things integrated and seamless for users. However, if you think it’s better suited as a standalone add-on due to the technical requirements, I’m open to that as well. Let me know how you’d like to proceed! Best regards,

Dade 2026-05-08T19:50:00+00:00

Kindly share the repo, I couldn’t find it before and that’s why I was posting here. It hooks wpa_handle_spammers directly, so it’s pretty straight forward.