WPIntell

Source evidence

Security Vulnerability

Mega Addons For WPBakery Page Builder · support · 2022-09-07T23:44:00+00:00

complaintsentiment
highseverity
0.91relevance
1replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

3 / 32 rows with source links

9.4% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

29 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

support
blubor unresolved
Any update on this security issue? https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/mega-addons-for-visual-composer/wordpress-mega-addons-for-wpbakery-page-builder-plugin-4-2-7-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_a_id=110 @blubor The forum is not a good place to ask. It’s been two weeks and the developer has not replied to this topic. All that came out of this topic is a pile on here and that is why I am closing this topic to new replies. All the many “I also am asking” replies have been archived. If a plugin is vulnerable then you and everyone using it needs to ask if the benefit of using it outweighs the security risk. I personally would not but I don’t use this plugin.

Comments

1 shown
Jan Dembowski 2022-09-26T15:51:00+00:00

@blubor The forum is not a good place to ask. It’s been two weeks and the developer has not replied to this topic. All that came out of this topic is a pile on here and that is why I am closing this topic to new replies. All the many “I also am asking” replies have been archived. If a plugin is vulnerable then you and everyone using it needs to ask if the benefit of using it outweighs the security risk. I personally would not but I don’t use this plugin.