WPIntell

Source evidence

poor implementation

License Manager for WooCommerce · review · 2025-02-21T11:11:00+00:00

complaintsentiment
mediumseverity
0.87relevance
0replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

10 / 67 rows with source links

14.9% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

57 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

review · 2 stars
lazy4 unresolved
First of all: we have not tested this plugin with themes or plugins for WordPress. So it may well be that it works well with wordpress-stuff. We wanted to use this plug-in to validate the licenses of our software. The way this plug-in was programmed is really miserable. The programmer obviously didn’t want to over-implement a single line of code and decided for the most trivial of implementations. For example: there is a value for ‘expires_at’ and a value for ‘valid for days’. But both fields exclude each other instead of the plugin is calculating the other value. So on the client side you first have to check which value comes back and then of course you have to implement two checks, one for each possible value. The plugin obviously does not perform any calculations, but only transmits static data from the database. A well-made plugin, where the programmer also thinks about the implementation, would return a calculated value for ‘days_remining’, regardless of which value was entered in WordPress. We purchased the pro-version but will give this plug-in up now. The example I described is just one trap you fall into when you have to query the API response yourself. This topic was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by lazy4 .

Comments

0 shown

No comments were stored for this source.