WPIntell

Source evidence

Missing pieces in visual editor …

SiteOrigin CSS · support · 2023-08-28T14:16:00+00:00

mixedsentiment
mediumseverity
0.73relevance
1replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

5 / 21 rows with source links

23.8% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

16 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

support
burnuser resolved
Great plugin! And I have some suggestions to make it even better: As a regular WordPress trainer I can say, that there are a few (often demanded) missing pieces in visual editor which could make the life of CSS beginners (like my trainees) much easier: Add position: sticky => has meanwhile broad browser support and is used very often in real web-design Tick-able option to add :hover => for good or worse, I see a very high demand and usage of using hoover effects Easy option to add !important => sometimes needed, but hard to recognise or correct for beginners Add simple option to add opacity (RGB A ) to Background Color Add selectable Child Elements to possible selectors (like in the existing “breadcrumb”-hierarchy of Parent Elements) Thanks for Your efforts in making a this plugin! Hi, Thanks for reaching out and for your kind words. We use a third party to cover linting (basically code analysis to highlight properties). Unfortunately, most of the viable options for this are lagging behind the CSS spec. We’re watching this space and as this changes, we’ll introduce this and support more modern CSS. I’ve logged internal feature requests for everything else requested. Thank you for outing your reasoning. Kind regards, Alex

Comments

1 shown
alexgso 2023-08-29T12:47:00+00:00

Hi, Thanks for reaching out and for your kind words. We use a third party to cover linting (basically code analysis to highlight properties). Unfortunately, most of the viable options for this are lagging behind the CSS spec. We’re watching this space and as this changes, we’ll introduce this and support more modern CSS. I’ve logged internal feature requests for everything else requested. Thank you for outing your reasoning. Kind regards, Alex