WPIntell

Source evidence

If only….

StickyAdmin · review · 2016-04-22T00:54:00+00:00

mixedsentiment
highseverity
0.97relevance
1replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

5 / 31 rows with source links

16.1% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

26 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

review · 3 stars
leewells unresolved
This plugins does have a lot of bugs, but there doesn’t seem to be any security concerns that I can tell from checking the code and javascripts. The problem is, as often as WP changes the admin methods, CSS, and javascripts that one guy (this awesome developer) will not be able to keep up with the chase of new changes. This project needs many more people working on it for it to be effective and as of the moment many things are just… missing. Such as the live Appearance editor, completely broken which was the no-go and uninstall point for me. Hey Mike, Thanks for the feedback and for the nice words! It is indeed a project that only one can’t handle, it’s huge. Feel free to share it, maybe developers out there might want to bring their knowledge in and build something extraordinary out of it during time, I dream of it! Cheers!

Comments

1 shown
dorian.tudorache 2016-04-25T14:58:00+00:00

Hey Mike, Thanks for the feedback and for the nice words! It is indeed a project that only one can’t handle, it’s huge. Feel free to share it, maybe developers out there might want to bring their knowledge in and build something extraordinary out of it during time, I dream of it! Cheers!