WPIntell

Source evidence

[FEATURE REQUEST] – Comma Separated CSS Exclusion Classes

WebberZone Link Warnings · support · 2026-05-02T03:36:00+00:00

mixedsentiment
mediumseverity
0.78relevance
4replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

6 / 31 rows with source links

19.4% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

25 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

support
Ronald Huereca resolved
The exclusion classes work great, with wzlw-no-icon-wrapper being used for container exclusions and the wzlw-no-icon-class works great on individually anchors beautifully. The problem I’m running into is edge cases, where a certain block was re-used throughout the site. The process of finding them, wrapping them and adding the exclusion class is an undertaking, particularly if there are a lot of instances. Since these site-wide elements share a common CSS class, it would be so much easier if I could just add it via the admin, and have that CSS class part of the exclusions. The request is to expose the exclusion fields in the UI and to make them comma separated so there is a possibility of custom CSS exclusions. I can foresee all the code behind this, so I understand this is a large ask. It would make integrating this into the site much easier, and allow for some real fine-tuning via classes. At the moment I’m relying on domain exclusions to catch some of the edge cases, but that is a catch-all, and I’d prefer to be more surgical about it. Thanks for the great plugin Ajay! This topic was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Ronald Huereca . Reason: Clarifying feature request title The page I need help with: [ log in to see the link] Currently you can customise the class name for inclusion/exclusion in the settings page – new feature I added in v1.2.0. Am I correct to understand that this field should be a comma-separated set vs a single name? I think that should be doable. Yes, having the fields be comma separated would be epic. I had this filed here: https://github.com/WebberZone/webberzone-link-warnings/issues/4 Will implement this in v1.4 @ronalfy This feature has been implemented in v1.4 which I released over the weekend.

Comments

4 shown
Ajay 2026-05-05T06:33:00+00:00

Currently you can customise the class name for inclusion/exclusion in the settings page – new feature I added in v1.2.0. Am I correct to understand that this field should be a comma-separated set vs a single name? I think that should be doable.

Ronald Huereca 2026-05-09T09:24:00+00:00

Yes, having the fields be comma separated would be epic.

Ajay 2026-05-09T09:29:00+00:00

I had this filed here: https://github.com/WebberZone/webberzone-link-warnings/issues/4 Will implement this in v1.4

Ajay 2026-05-25T14:30:00+00:00

@ronalfy This feature has been implemented in v1.4 which I released over the weekend.