WPIntell

Source evidence

Bad code quality

User Sync · review · 2024-01-10T10:12:00+00:00

complaintsentiment
mediumseverity
0.75relevance
0replies
Evidence onlycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

1 / 1 rows with source links

100.0% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

0 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

review · 1 stars
Torsten Landsiedel unresolved
Unfortunately the code quality is very bad … Buttons with fixed widths that don’t work with longer translations, wrongly used functions which break the markup, features that don’t work, because of wrong checks, FAQ is linking to generic FAQ page without any info the plugin itself, no tutorial how to set it up (you need to google it) and so on … In the end, I was successful. But it was a lot of var_dumping and error logging needed to find the problems in the code, so that I know how to circumvent them. Not recommended in this state.

Comments

0 shown

No comments were stored for this source.