WPIntell

Source evidence

Absolutely brilliant, if a bit barebones

Smart Click Tracker · review · 2025-09-08T03:44:00+00:00

praisesentiment
mediumseverity
0.56relevance
1replies
Evidence linked to opportunitycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

4 / 31 rows with source links

12.9% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

27 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

review · 5 stars
qwioqwio unresolved
I’m surprised there’s no reviews for this. I’ve tried a few plugins to track clicks (Matmoto Tag manager – nightmare. Burst Insights – buggy & paid. PostHog – good but overkill. Aurora heatmap – misses a lot of clicks) and this is by far the best. Instant analytics updates, very accurate, dead easy to set up if you know a little CSS. It just works, and as far as I can tell there’s no paid features. It’s an absolutely brilliant plugin, it just needs a few extra options (like being able to clear clicks per element, rather than having to make a new tracker or clear all analytics). Very very highly recommended. Assuming this tool can easily fulfill the purpose of counting click tracking, PostHog is a comprehensive analytics tool and Aurora Heatmap is not a tool for counting the absolute number of clicks. I wonder if the other tools are really suitable for comparison for this purpose.

Comments

1 shown
usazu 2025-09-08T06:07:00+00:00

Assuming this tool can easily fulfill the purpose of counting click tracking, PostHog is a comprehensive analytics tool and Aurora Heatmap is not a tool for counting the absolute number of clicks. I wonder if the other tools are really suitable for comparison for this purpose.