Source evidence

abandoned?

PMID Citation Plus · support · 2014-12-05T08:55:00+00:00

PMID Citation Plus plugin evidence original source source API

praisesentiment

mediumseverity

0.38relevance

0replies

Evidence onlycommercial context

Proof Health

Open evidence

Commercial opportunities need traceable source links before they are treated as build-worthy.

1 / 1 rows with source links

100.0% of this page's analysis has direct source links.

0 build-decision rows missing links

0 rows here require auditable proof before promotion.

0 rows with no attached evidence

0 rows have source counts but still need direct links.

Conversation

support

mgscano unresolved

i wonder if this one was abandoned … such a shame, though. it’s really simple and straightforward https://wordpress.org/plugins/pmid-citation-plus/

Evidence Context

Evidence only

Evidence only

This row is useful source evidence, but it has not been promoted into a build-worthy commercial opportunity.

Analysis

heuristic-v1

Summary: abandoned?: users praise easy, which suggests what competitors already do well.

Evidence quote: it’s really simple and straightforward https://wordpress.org/plugins/pmid-citation-plus/ i wonder if this one was abandoned … such a shame, though.

abandoned?

Proof Health

Conversation

Comments